>>3237987Not to be a d/ic/k but that kind of a chart is exactly what we should try to avoid. It reeks of superficiality.
Their top books of 2014 is essentially what one would get if they typed in "The best novels of the 20th century" into google. It's a meaningless collection of who's-who in the world of literature, and you literally have to be living under a rock to not know most of those authors and titles.
So, rather than namedropping whichever author's name or book cover you like the most, why don't we gather a list of books that anons' art benefited from the most in 2017.
Yes, the list would be sparse because most of you numbnuts didn't do anything this year, but it's the thought that counts.
