>>3721773The thing is, you can treat your job like just a job, or you can go beyond and make it pure art. Leyendecker was just making socks commercials with his art, and he could do a mediocre job at that. But he didn't. It's your choice if you want to be the same as everyone or if you want to be a myth.
>>3721824https://blog.piekniewski.info/2018/10/29/ai-winter-update/In the OP's video, what I saw was a computer mixing and matching faces, this technology is not new. Sure, the video is impressive, the transitions between faces are very good. However, to go from that to a complete work of art is stretching. How many different poses, clothes, lighting schemes, atmosphere effects, etc you need to feed into a computer to make it create art? As with any AI technology, the video only shows a very constrained set of circumstances in which AI can work. And remember, AI only copies, it never creates. We as humans get bored of the same styles after a while, that's why art evolves. Can AI create new styles, new trends without an human operator? I seriously doubt it will be possible in the near or even in the far future. Even the video in the OP is a bit dubious.
