>>3724927this. as much as people love hoarding books they love hoarding useless "tutorials" and "infographics" that don't actually have anything to take away from them since they didn't do the study themselves and that they won't ever draw.
>>3725730No it's fucking terrible. It might be inspirational to really /beg/ artists but it's overcomplicating everything about art. You read the chart, now what do you do?
When you're drawing you're going to be touching on most of those anyway, there's no need to arbitrarily divide them. When you find a place where you know you're weak you'll do studies on that. The chart preys on people who need shit to be like an RPG, so they think there's actually a path to drawing like Nsio with a few simple steps. The focus topics are legitimate things to think about but straight mileage and learning to critique your own work (training your eye to "see" better art) are what gets you better.
The mastery levels are bullshit. Mastery just means you'll consistently produce better art instead of getting "lucky" once every few times. Draw a lot, fail fast, take your time. Study actual anatomy and perspective books, draw gesture, draw art you like, study/make copies of artists you like.
>>3723521 is a good list of resources. You need the fundamentals to build on top of. You need to be able to draw what you see so that you can put it on paper. You need to be able to make the mark that you see in your brain on the paper and then you will be well on your way to getting good. See what you want to draw, imagine the line in your head, and then transfer your head to paper. Eventually it becomes effortless. It is very hard before that point so that's why we practice with measuring and using our eyes to copy.
