>>96169224> Did it hereThat's the exact opposite of not acknowledging the issues are multifaceted, idiot. I pointed out that although there's criticism of Marvel, there's one major source of problems, "the elephant in the room", which keeps getting excused and shielded from criticism. It immediately follows that there are other problems ergo it is multifaceted.
> Immediately calling me a damage controller rather than engaging my argument,But that's exactly what you did, you threw all those baseless accusations about my political belief and level of interest in comics despite none of it being present in my arguments nor relevant in any way. So not only have you've just done what you are claiming I have,
> You NEED SJWs to be the "elephant in the room" despite me agreeing that they are a problemWhat the fuck does that even mean. Yes I'm advocating for discussion of this problem, I don't want it swept under the carpet as is the custom here. I don't need this problem to keep existing as you seem to imply, in fact I want every professional currently responsible for it to fuck off comics.
> Assmad capslock postingoh no I'm using capital letters I must be very angry.
> putting words in my mouth about redditWhat words am I putting in your mouth? Your entire argument frames me as a troll completely foreign to comics and /co/, or at the very least a complete casual. Are you denying this? That's all you, champ.
> getting defensive as fuck about even being called a casualPointing out that your adhominem "argument" is not grounded in facts is not "getting defensive as fuck". "hey here's this problem" "OH LOOK ANOTHER CASUAL" "I'm not a casual" "HAHAHA YOU ARE SO BUTTMAD AND DEFENSIVE".
> chimping out may be hyperboleya think? keep backpedaling.
As for "controversy sales", I've seen that theory before. The issue is that the strategy clearly fails - sales keep plummeting year after year. Why would they continue this, and why shouldn't I object?
