>>94601045>trying a new tacticProblem is anon, it's not a good tactic. People compare Kim to a screaming 8 year old throwing a tantrum, which is highly inaccurate. After all, screaming and throwing a tantrum in front of an 8 year old would either scare it or amuse it so much, it stops throwing the tantrum. This is not the case here, that shit leads to escalation.
What would have been a better tactic would have been to 'gently but firmly' remind him of the effects of missile systems going off, the various UN, US and other international resolutions that all countries must comply to if someone is stupid enough to use a nuke, use a carrot and stick approach for North Korea, or perhaps more appropriately China.
The only thing worse he could have done was either nuke Guam first, or show up to a meeting with a powerpoint that consists entirely of Kim's head photoshopped onto fat naked women.
The media isn't biased against Trump because he's a Republican who ran for Presidency. Trump's been a laughing stock the entirety of his life. He's been mocked in sci fi, he's been mocked in children's films, he's been caught guilty of fraud, false accounting, he's gone bankrupt three times, he's been guilty of refusing to rent to ethnic groups multiple times, he's the walking example of why private universities are a bad idea, he's responsible for most of the blunders outside of wall street for stupidest market ventures. And that's just the stuff that can be proven, the man is a caricature of character defects and marxist's view of capitalism.
I know that Bernie wasn't the democratic rep and to be honest, I doubt fraud simply due to the fact that 'socialised healtcare' is an MK ultra catchphrase for most Americans in both parties. But can you honestly say, out of all the candidates for the Republicans, that Trump was the best choice?
>>94593876It was great, and heartbreaking. It gave a basic rundown of how shit would actually go, and it's... it's just painful.
