I can see where you're coming from, but fetishes in and on themselves don't have to be sexual in nature. All you have to do is build a fixation or association to it for sexual arousal. Easiest example that proves this is feet, crosswiring theory (and it IS only a theory) aside, it isn't seen as inherently sexual and yet a good chunk of the population go for it whether you want to accept it or not.
HOWEVER, there is a difference between "fetish" and "fantasy" or "preference." Someone who likes tall girls only has a preference for tall girls because that's a natural physical trait that can't be changed. Someone who has a thing for ice queens or bookish librarians is chasing a fantasy because one's a specific archetype that isn't tangible or a constant and the other is a job, that bookish librarian could end up moving up to be a psychiatrist, a paralegal or what have you. Best way to differentiate is that fetishes are a constant, something in concept that in on itself is transferable rather than conditional. There are exceptions of course, like amputees but the reason for something like that is that a thing like that is life altering and the only change from that with known and possible means is technically becoming a cyborg (gaining a prothetic is technically this, so no need for intricate sci-fi robotics) or BMI + muscle tone which is based on fitness but can be maintained.>>93279853
Bullshit. You're just trying to draw a line in the sand just so you can justify ostracize people with fetishes you don't have, don't qualify or don't understand and think someone who faps to Tile Patterns or Balloon Knees is someone who ought to be put on a watchlist or something.