>>110175993>Hot but sportyIt was to justify Bugs' crush on her.
>More competent than the boysNot really, I'd say just as competent as Bugs.
>Token girlThat's not on her though, she was tasked with being the only girl in a cast of boys, she was doomed to stand out.
>Hates being called "doll/sweetie/hun/etc."Glimpse of a personality that could've been expanded in a series. If people judged you only for your looks (even if positively) you'd be pissed too.
>>110176015She wasn't, I fully agree.
>>110176056Roger Rabbit was the best movie of its very specific genre, no doubt about it. The LT movies had their charm but nothing spectacular. I admit that I really like them, but objectively I can say they're just decent at best.
>sequelNo wait, did you not see that the sequel is already announced? We even got a teaser picture, and Lola could be in it, judging from said teaser picture. I doubt they'll use her TLTS personality, so I'm really hoping for my breakthrough, to finally get a version I can fully enjoy.
>the rescueYou're right, of course, but still, getting rescued means she's not infallible, just good. Then it led to the "saved damsel in distress" type of scene, but still.
She was the love interest because that was her role for the movie, but she could've been more, based just from that. Hell, make basket one of her interests as a character to justify her being good, I don't care. As for making her looney... I mean, she could be like bugs, so they could work better as a duo. I'm sure they could write her wacky if they wanted.
>>110176165I feel like that claim confused a lot of people, but what I meant is that to me she felt like they were trying something like that and it could've become like that had it been expanded beyond "background character/love interest", and it would've made for an angle that I would've vastly preferred.
