>>104148661Both of them are equally shit, just in different ways. The original, while in many ways technically better drawn, has a lot of really bad decisions when it comes to things like design and composition
There's more to art than just the act of drawing things that are hard to draw. You also need to think like a photographer or a cinematographer if you want to make something that's both skillful and visually appealing
The reboot does the cinematic side of things way better; the shots are much more varied, the designs, while a bit shit, at least have some variety outside of their outfits and actually look their age, the faces are more stylized, allowing the characters to be infinity more expressive and thus appealing than the old ones ever could, ect.
The issues in the reboot come in during the animation part of the animation, where you get shit like
>>104148549The original is well drawn, but with garish, ugly designs (the supposed teenagers look like 50 year old chain smokers), stiff posing and flat compositons
The reboot has better designs, but looks like it was drawn by a five year old
