>>103861167Wrong, pleb.
Clothing is and always has been a symbol of civilization. The nudity associated with Olympic games was a big old Fuck You to the Persians, the foremost empire of the time, and then got rationalized out from there.
Artistic nudity is an aesthetic choice used by artists of all time periods, especially in Italy (like fucking David).
One account of the Judgement of Paris declares that Hera should have won objectively speaking but she covered herself due to being married while Aphrodite flaunted her sex appeal and Paris bought it like the horny little shit he was.
And whatever else you can say about 'muh soggy knee', she has a point in the context she's speaking about. It's a portrayal that directly indicates someone as a sex icon rather than as their own person. That's objectification in a real sense, though whether it's malicious or not is out of the scope of this thread. It might even be less offensive to Wonder Woman if the centerfold was nude, because it would at least be an athletic display as well. For some woman who comes from a world where amazons rule, it's not at all surprising for her to interpret that as 'men think women are pets for sex only'.
