>>103810247Again, nobody argued that Boros > Saitama here. But Saitama didn’t beat the guy with one simple punch.
He punched him several times, so this premise of Saitama always beating a guy with just one punch is simply fanon shit. Somebody here already argued that he doesn’t actually always defeat characters with one punch, but that he’s capable of it.
Personally, I believe it’s ridiculous people bring up metatextual bullshit when it comes to characters like Saitama. Because you usually don’t do it for the opposing party.
In a comparison of Popeye and Saitama, does Saitama win because he always manages to win? Or does Popeye win because he always manages to win after eating spinach?
