>>110191846>just something different than what we’re always fed in American adult cartoons.1) Different does not mean good.
2) Things from other cultures will be far more different from American shows.
>It makes no sense for nearly every adult cartoon to be created by a man when there are just as many women willing to do something with the medium.Wrong. The most talented should make shows, not those who satisfy the diversity quota.
>Rebecca Sugar already proved that there are tons of interesting and mature stories from women that we’ve been missing out on in children’s cartoonsBeing this deluded. Steven Universe is one of the worst shows because it's about an overpowered crybaby who can achieve everything because he's overpowered, not because the conflict is well written or explored.
>but more often than not, a story told from the perspective of, say, a woman, PoC, etc. is more effectively and accurately told by a member of that social group.Your wishful thinking is not evidence. Harry Potter was written by a middle-age woman but it's told from the perspective of a teenage boy and I doubt it would have been any better if it was actually written by a teenage boy.
>so who better to explore Steven Universe’s themes regarding relationships and mental health than Rebecca Sugar?Given how badly they were explored literally anyone else.
>Why else would Matt Braly and Ian JQ have been open to having writing staffs predominantly comprised of women?Appealing to idiots like you who don't understand that good writing comes from talented writers, not diversity.
>one of the most entertaining female protagonists from the former.Amphibia is average. I'd say Loud House had a better mix of female characters.
>Adult animation could use more of that diversity.Adult animation needs less gross humour and more people who understand what adult issues actually are.
