>>102267113>His failure to delete his tweets plus accusing other people of pedophilia is recent
You still have failed to show how the dletion of his twets is relevant. And accusing other of being pedo is not what made him being fired. only his old twits have been used against him, so this is still irrelevant.>Him accusing Leto of pedophilia plus mentioning his friends and retweets is.
His accusation on Leto are not the reason he was fired. If it was, he would have been fired when he did one years ago. We are focusing on the twits that fired him.>He did not delete his tweets when he was employed by Disney thus nullifying your retarded point
It doesn't. You still haven't explained why deleting his tweets matter>You've yet to give reason why he didn't deleted his tweet sooner.
I will not make assumption, but I know for a fact he has made a point of deleting every bad tweets that was brought up to him, way before the whole thing exploded. In case of ignorance, you give the benefit of the doubt.>Completely subjective
No? and by that I mean no. By the very definition of the word Insincere is the opposite of sincere.>Because its you can't accept her apology because of some other tweet? That's dumbfuck as fuck anon.
No, anon, not because of other tweets, but because she rewtited them to show the public that other think she did nothing wrong. If her apology were sincere, she would have either told them to stop saying she did nothing wrong, or would have simply ingored them. And again, you rely on insult while at the same time misconstruing what I said.>I cannot find a more wrong statement on this board but hey an unironic retard will always think he's on the right :^)
Except it's objectively true, case in point, you didn't even try to prove those statement were false, you tried to prove that Gunn didn't belong to one of the two category of the listed statement. And didn't even succeed. You didn't prove any of those statement wrong.