That's just you having shit reading comprehension, retard. >>183239581
meant he didn't use Amiami because they don't undervalue, which other stores like NY do. Then you have >>183249775
responding like a retard, especially if he "was very fucking clearly responding to the idea that customs decides to tax your shit based on your retailer of choice" like you said. And you're a double retard for advocating that. What I did say >>183250273
is related to what was said in >>183239581
where the store you order from does have an impact in you getting charged or not if the store allows to undervalue or not. Now learn to follow a conversation, because you clearly didn't back up the right anon on this one.